- An
Overview of California Indian History
-
- by
Jack Norton Jr.
-
-
- California
is a land of immense variety and resources.
Its splendid mountain ranges, long coastlines, rich marshlands, clear
streams and beautiful deserts provide the greatest number of plant and
animal species in
North America
.
California
has the highest peak (
Mt.
Whitney
) in the lower
United States
, the deepest canyon (Kings) and the largest and oldest trees (redwood and
bristlecone pine) in
America
. No other area of equal size in
the
United States
has so much diversity of ecological and biological environments.
-
For thousands of years native people lived well within their
homelands. The Indians of
northwestern
California
, for example, used large redwood canoes upon the rivers and along the coast
where they harvested salmon by the thousands.
The birds filled the sky and huge groups of deer grazed upon the
grasslands of central
California
provided beautiful and creative material for religious expressions.
The desert people of southern
California
engineered complex water systems that sustained themselves and their food
sources.
-
California Indian societies were remarkably diverse and creative.
There were at least 100 distinct cultural groups with hundreds of
different spoken languages. Recent
studies have suggested a native population of well over a million which was
greater than any other area of equal size north of
Mexico
.
-
The Indian people of
California
developed various forms of governance long before Europeans arrived.
There physical and social needs as well as religious expressions were
supported by agreed upon laws. Membership
in the group was defined by recognized boundaries, a common language,
established customs and a shared history.
These factors define a nation which is recognized throughout the
world. Thus Indians of
California are nation states with inherent sovereignty
to protect themselves from trespass, encroachment, and invasion.
-
Although the Spanish invasion and its colonial intent to christianize
the
California
native people resulted in the death of 70% of the mission population, this
was not as devastating as the inhumanity caused by the Euro-Americans.
-
By 1844 the admixture of religious tenets and economic greed
crystalized as Manifest Destiny. This
concept supported the belief that
America
as a Christian nation was the civilizer of the earth.
This justified for many the taking of land and property from others
particularly those who were not Christians.
President Polk’s expansionist policies favored the annexation of
western lands and by 1846 he had intrigued and bullied
Mexico
into a war in which
California
was the prize. Official
California Indian-Governmental relations were established after the
Californios, the Mexican descendants living in
California
, surrendered to the American forces at Cahuenga on January l3, l847.
In March, l847, General Stephen W. Kearny, first administrator in
California, appointed John Sutter and Marino Vallejo as subagents of Indian
Affairs. These appointments
initiated patterns of exploitation and self-interest that clouded Indian
destiny for years. Sutter, for example, used Maidu and Nissen men, women and
children for economic and personal gain while Marino Vallejo captured and
enslaved hundreds of Wappo and Pomo people to work
his estates north of
San Francisco
.
-
In general the
California
native people particularly those north of
Sacramento
were not affected by the war with
Mexico
. However, in central
California
, due to the manipulation of John Sutter and other large Rancho owners, a
few Indians formed a small battalion. In
southern
California
the war intensified the disruption of Indian societies by forcing many to
flee to other groups or restructuring tribal people into autocratic
organizations such as Juan Antonio’s Cahuilla people.
His alliance with Jose del Carmen
Lugo
at Rancho San Bernardino permitted the Cahuillas to live within their
ancestral lands in exchange for protecting the Lugo Rancho from trespass.
However, many Indians lived on small productive farms with livestock,
gardens and orchards within their aboriginal lands or they were forced to
move into towns and took menial jobs.
-
In May l847, Colonel Richard Mason, a southerner from
Virginia
, replaced
Kearny
as military governor. Mason
launched a series of Indian restrictions similar to the Black Codes in the
South after the Civil War. California
Indians were to show upon demand, certificates of employment; they were to
carry passes when moving from one area to another; and they could not gather
in groups or crowds without causing suspicion.
In
Central California
, Indians could not own horses and fire arms were forbidden.
General Persifer Smith, Commander of the Pacific Division, declared
any Indian living in a village breaking these rules would endanger the
entire community and all would be punished.
-
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was confirmed by Congress in May
l848, ending the Mexican War. As
an international treaty, the civil rights of Mexican citizens, including
Indians were considered superior
to any state laws. In
addition, Article XI declared that California Indians should not be placed
in jeopardy or be removed to other areas.
Congress was consumed with the debate over Black Slavery extending
into the newly acquired territories. Furthermore,
Presidents Zachary Taylor, l848-l852,
and Millard Fillmore, l852-l854. abrogated their constitutional leadership.
In this vacumn, harsh military codes continued in
California
until November, l849, when Peter Burnett and John McDougal, elected the
first Governor and Lt Governor. During
their administration, they called for the extermination of California
Indians.
-
When gold was discovered in January, l848, over 100,000 men inundated
the state. By the fall of the
following year, the ratio of males to females was 12 to 1 and in the first
years many men took Indian women as concubines and disrupted Indian lives
with terror, disease and murder. For
example, Indian scalps were sold in Marysville, Yreka, and
Shasta
City
from $5 to $15 a piece. Indians
were shot indiscriminately while hunting or fishing or villages were
directly attacked. In
Shasta
City
, for instance, miners burned down the Wintu Council House and massacred 300
innocent people. Reports of
these atrocities reached the newly formed Bureau of Indian Affairs within
the Department of the Interior, and in April, 1849, Adam Johnston was
appointed Indian Agent of California.
-
On
April 22, 18
50, the California Legislature passed the Act for the Governance and
Protection of Indians. This
law superceded federal responsibilities and the laws of the Supreme Court by
allowing rampant victimization of
California
native people. The act, often referred to as an “California Indian Slave
Law” bonded Indian persons of
all ages to varying periods of servitude.
The law stipulated that in “no case shall a white man be convicted
of any offense upon the testimony of any Indian.”
In addition, California Indian people could be arrested for
loitering, drunkenness, or leading a profligate life.
To make bail, Indian labor from a week to several months was
required. Bail was normally paid
by local farmers, particularly in the
Los Angeles
area. California Indians were
generally paid small wages, or with discarded clothing, and in many cases
with hard liquor.
-
In 1860, this “California Indian Slave Law” was amended to
liberalize the apprenticeship of children.
Over 4,000 Indian children were indentured in the northern counties
alone. When the gold fields
became less productive some individuals turned to kidnaping and selling
children, particularly young girls, to miners and farmers.
For example, in 1855, Pierce Asbill sold 35 Yuki girls 16 years old
or younger to miners in
Yuba City
and Marysville. Those who fought back were harried and in many cases
murdered by federal troops and local volunteer units, who were paid by the
State of
California
over 1million dollars for their services (Chapter 12 Statutes).
In addition, these volunteer groups were encouraged to file for
property within the aboriginal homelands of California Indian people.
-
Reports of genocidal activities from
Johnston
and others provided the background for the negotiation of
- eighteen treaties from 1851 to
January of 1852. The total
acreage promised to California Indian Nations was less than three percent of
the aboriginal lands. Yet the
citizenry and the
California
legislature demanded non-ratification claiming too much “valuable land was
left to savages.” On July 8th
1852, the U.S. Senate rejected the treaties in closed session and ordered
them filed in the Senate without access to the public.
California Indian Nations as equal signatories were not notified.
In the meantime,
San Diego
County
arbitrarily imposed a $600 a year tax on the Cupeno people.
Antonio Garra declared that the U. S. Government was making treaties
with California Indian Nations and the state and county had no force and
affect. Garra tried to organize
Indians throughout southern
California
against this illegal encroachment but was captured, shot and killed,
January, 10, 1852.
-
By September 1852, Congress superceded presidential treaty authority
and appointed Lt. Edward Beale, a former naval officer in the Mexican War,
Superintendent of Indian Affairs to
California
. Beale proposed five military
reservations be established and supported by Indian labor.
By fall, 1853, Beale confirmed
Fort
Tejon
and the Tejon Reservation in southern
California
upon an already existent and highly productive Indian community known as the
Sebastian Reserve. These five
military reservations along with adjoining Indian farms created from 1853 to
1864 were manipulated in size and number by the dictates of
California
citizens. In the meantime,
Congress passed the California Land Claims Commission Act in March of 1851,
which primarily reviewed claims of ownership by former Californios.
However, it also charged the commission to consider and protect
Indian ownership of land. All
California
counties were required to send Indian records to the three member commission
at
San Francisco
. Most counties refused to do so
and the U. S. Government failed to enforce compliance.
Consequently, California Indian were defrauded of their aboriginal
lands and their sovereignty was greatly impaired.
By the end of 1852 there were
- 223,856 Anglo Americans living
in
California
-
In 1859, various county supervisors began rejecting Indian claims for
goods and services within county jurisdiction and
the
California
legislature upheld these actions. In
Mendocino
County
, for example, the Pomo people of
Northern California
, were directed to report to the Mendocino or Round Valley Reservation.
However, many Indians refused because of the dismal and often
life-threatening conditions that existed on the reservations.
Additionally, several reservations lacked an adequate water supply,
and on the Mendocino Reservation, irresponsible logging practices had
destroyed the yearly salmon runs. Widespread
corruption and fraud existed within California Indian Affairs.
For example, in 1858, Superintendent Henly, was charged and dismissed
for fraud and malfesance for diverting Indian supplies to private accounts.
Congress responded to this venality by reducing the annual budget for
California Indian services by two-thirds and turned their interest to the
coming Civil War.
-
California Indians were directly affected by the Civil War because
the professional federal troops were replaced by the California State
Militia. These volunteer groups
were usually composed of men interested in divesting Indian Nations of their
lands. Soon several massacres
such as the Indian Island Massacre, the Wailaki, Usal and Needle Rock
Massacres, and the Mattole Valley Massacre occurred.
Additionally, the forced removal of the Paiute, Maidu, Konkow, and
Pit River peoples to distant reservations in northern and central
California
took place. Devastation to the
California Indian population also
took place in southern
California
as smallpox raged throughout the area. For
instance, the Cahuilla people led by Juan Antonio fled to San Timoteo Canyon
and the nearby settlers moved in and took all their land and property.
When the Luiseno people from the
Village
of
Pejamo
near present day Temecula left to harvest food, their white neighbors stole
their homes and livestock. During
the late 1860s, increasing numbers of white settlers stole the best watered
Indian farms, orchards and gardens. The
Indian Agents were ineffective in protecting Indian rights.
-
By 1869 President Grant, embarrassed by the national scandal of
corruption and incompetency within the Bureau of Indian Affairs, turned to
religious denominations to administer Indian policies.
Congress, busy with Reconstruction programs, readily confirmed these
religious nominees, thereby enacting Grant’s “Quaker Policy.”
In
California
, the Catholic Church had converted, often by force, thousands of Indian
people. However, the
Episcopalian order was assigned to western reservations.
In some areas of
California
, divisive and bitter
- debate over religious doctrine
severed Indian groups and families. In
addition, the religious administrators generally attempted to suppress
Indian rituals and ceremonies causing further isolation and disorientation.
In the meantime, President Grant used his executive power to
establish the San Pasqual and the Pala reservations for southern California
Indians by January, 1870. However,
Charles Taggart, through the San Diego Union led a vicious attack against
the establishment of the two reservations.
Interestingly, several Indian leaders such as Olgairo Calac warned
the Indian people that the U. S. Government could betray their word and that
if anyone moved to the reservations they would loose their aboriginals homes
and still be unprotected. One
year later, President Grant revoked his executive order and white settlers
flooded the San Pasqual Valley and took the Luiseno people’s
home and property.
-
In September, 1875, the sheriff of
San Diego
County
enforced an eviction order against the remaining Luiseno villages in the
Temecula
Valley
. The Luiseno’s forced removal
was paid by the confiscation of their livestock.
Then, in 1882 President Arthur established the Pechanga Reservation
named after the Luiseno term for the spring located in a nearby canyon.
From 1875 to 1877 thirteen executive order reservations were
established in southern
California
. However, this did little to
lessen the numerous acts of violence and theft committed by white settlers.
Special Agent D. A. Dryden, for example, reported that “Indian
gardens were invaded, pastures were consumed by livestock, and water was
turned away from their ditches.” Indians
had no redress.
-
The dispossession of California Indian lives and property came to the
attention of several Indian reformers during the 1880s, such as Helen Hunt
Jackson who advocated for the just treatment of Indian peoples. However, by
applying ideals of Jeffersonian yeomanry that emphasized land ownership,
Victorian domesticity and Christian values, many reform efforts further
assaulted the integrity of traditional Indian communities and life ways.
- For instance, by 1887 the
General Allotment Act whereby all reservations were to be divided into small
individual parcels increased the forces of assimilation and acculturation.
In the meantime, Congress continued to encroach upon Indian
sovereignty by passing the Seven Major Crimes Act in 1885, which assumed
jurisdiction of capital crimes committed on reservations.
However, Indian victims of murder, rape and burglary committed by
white citizens had no standing to bring charges in local or state courts.
As non-citizens or wards of the government, California Indian people
could select land under the Indian Homestead Act of 1875 thereby receiving
citizenship entitlement, hence legal protection, or fend for themselves and
retain Indian Tribal membership
-
In southern
California
, Helen Hunt Jackson exposed the venality of white encroachment but failed
to induce Congress to act upon the behalf of the California Indians.
Finally, in an effort to “touch
America
’s heart” she wrote the novel Ramona (1885) but it was co-opted
into a romanticized version of southern
California
mission history.
After he death in 1886, however, several reform movements carried out
her demands for California Indian justice.
In 1891, Congress passed the Act for the Relief of Mission Indians.
By year’s end there were 33 reservations total in southern
California
. However, nearly 80% of the
land was unusable; it was often barren, rocky or water-less.
-
Maintaining cultural identity was particularly difficult for many
California Indians. By 1900, for
instance, only 5,000 Indians were identified as living on the reservations;
the remaining 11,000 were scattered throughout the general population or
lived in small family groups in isolated areas.
Further, the Bureau of Indian Affairs had codified a list of Indian
offenses, which forbade religious, medicinal and marriage customs along with
prohibiting Indian languages.
-
From 1900 to the 1920s, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, through
internal mandates, often denied medical and welfare services to Indian
people. By 1906, for example,
congressional investigations revealed overwhelming poor health conditions of
California Indians due to near starvation, poverty and disease such as
tuberculosis and trachoma. Congress appropriated $100,000 for purchase of
land to provide for homeless California Indians.
These reform efforts rectified some blatant governmental injustices.
By 1910, an additional twenty-five reservations or Rancherias were
established across
California
. This federal policy was
amplified until 1950, creating 117 reservations which totaled less than
700,000 acres of the original 91 million acres of aboriginal territory.
-
In 1927 the State of
California
authorized the Attorney General to sue the federal government for
remuneration. The following
year, Congress passed the Jurisdictional Act and the suit was filled before
the U.S. Court of Claims as Indians of California vs.
United States
. In a complex and protracted
litigation, the United States Government determined that all goods and
services provided California Indians since 1852, including: the cost of
needles; shovels; harnesses; old World War I uniforms, would be deducted
from any award. By December,
1944, the court awarded approximately 17 million dollars at $1.25 an acre.
An offset of 12 million was deducted and the remaining 5 million was
distributed to 36,000 California Indians in the early 1950s.
-
While the California Indian claims case sought government redress,
many California Indians were outraged by the unjust compensation received.
When Congress created the Indian Claims Commission in 1946 , which
allowed only monetary compensation and not the return of land fraudulently
acquired, California Indian people sued for the remaining 91,764,600 acres
of the state. By 1951,
twenty-three separate appeals were filed before the commission.
After a long and arduous fight, Congress finally authorized payment
of 29 million dollars in 1964. However,
the Claims Commission reduced the litigated acreage to 64,425,000, and
adjudicated forty-seven cents per acre as an equitable judgment.
This amount was surprising in light of the U. S. Government’s
designation of $1.25 per acre for un-surveyed land.
In addition, no adjudication, apology or compensation for the
genocide committed or for any moral wrongs or breach of fair or honest
practices was forthcoming. Thus,
today, many California Indian Nations are wary of federal, state and local
governments. Regardless,
California Indian people survived and continue to be the spiritual
caretakers of this land.
-